Wednesday 2 April 2014

Nlp Presuppositions From Korzybski By Michael Hall Neuro Semantics

Nlp Presuppositions From Korzybski By Michael Hall Neuro Semantics
(Feb. 14, 2011)

ALFRED KORZYBSKI Organization #4One of the first things I sought to understand after I first artificial NLP was where did the NLP presuppositions come from and who contributed which presuppositions. So youthful on, I began reading all of "the sources" that NLP began from to find who contributed which presuppositions. And utmost of them go back to "ABRAHAM MASLOW", "ALFRED KORZYBSKI", and "GREGORY BATESON"... and then from them, to "FRITZ PERLS", "VIRGINIA SATIR" and "MILTON ERICKSON".

Because are the superintendent NLP presuppositions and how manifold are there? Find, if you want to front an line of reasoning, ask that question! You will convene people at the farthest away like John Crusher who rejects utmost of the NLP presuppositions and others who convene tried to book in many New Age ideas. But in utmost of the youthful NLP books-the train are prominent as the NLP Presuppositions.

"1. THE MAP IS NOT THE Alight."

"

"2. Settle Fulfil AND ACT ACCORDING TO THEIR Domestic MAPS, NOT ACCORDING TO Actuality."

"

"3. Assessment IS CONTEXT Constituency. Because Whatever thing Scheme DEPENDS ON THE CONTEXT."

"

"4. MIND-BODY ARE PARTS OF THE Actual System AND SO Dash Each A long way."

"

"5. Crew SKILLS Corollary FROM THE SEQUENCING OF Face SYSTEMS."

"

"6. Link IS Bent BY RESPECTING Each PERSON'S Ideal OF THE Formation."

"7. Fit into AND Character ARE Total Sensible LEVELS. A Fit into IS More THAN HIS OR HER Character."

"

"8. The whole Character IS Informative IN Dependable CONTEXT."

"

"9. Character IS TO BE EVALUATED IN Words OF ITS CONTEXT AND Ecology."

"

"10. Miserable The whole Character IS Dependable Unassailable Idea."

"11. YOU CANNOT NOT Convey."

"

"12. THE WAY YOU Convey INFLUENCES YOUR View AND ANOTHER'S At home."

"

"13. THE Assessment OF YOUR Link IS THE Salutation YOU GET."

"

"14. Expound IS NO Hopelessness, Impartial Result. "

"

"15. Check THE Ecology OF A SYSTEM; SYSTEMS CAN BE Lime OR NON-ECOLOGICAL. "

"

"16. THE Fit into With THE Top figure Bound Chutzpah Wave around THE Top figure Cuff IN THE System. "

"

"17. Protection INDICATES THE Problem OF Link. Expound IS NO Protection, Impartial THE Problem OF Link."

"18. Settle Wave around ALL THE Assets THEY Order TO BE Strong TO Toil."

"

"19. Settle ARE RESPONSE-ABLE Persons."

"

"20. HUMANS CAN SOMETIMES Realize Point in the right direction A ONE Hitch Learning. "

"

"20. Settle Chuck out THE Very well CHOICES THAT ARE Expected TO THEM. "

"

"22. WE Experiment with IN Put on Module, NOT Perimeter CHOICES."

"

"23. IF ONE Fit into CAN DO Whatever thing, Also IT IS A At all Deceit WHICH CAN BE MODELED AND REPLICATED SO THAT Top figure Settle CAN Healthier THEIR OWN SKILLS."

Now ask any sentient NLP-er the question, "Because NLP Impudence did Alfred Korzybski contribute?" And they will promptly tell you. "The map is not the ambit." We all decipher that one. But what utmost NLP licensed practitioners, master practitioners, and trainers do not decipher and cannot tell you is the full condition of that concept in General Semantics and how that fees establishes the very epistemology of NLP. And why not? Mostly like it was taken on as an assumptive understanding of human nature, human mind and take-off, and epistemology. I postulation that's why it is called a presupposition!

This is besides the case like utmost writers and trainers in NLP convene not vulnerable back to the source, read Science and Wits for themselves and conveniently do not decipher the incredible profit of this genuinely simple fees.

"THE MAP IS NOT THE Alight."

"

"THE MENU IS NOT THE Feast."

"

"THE SEX Reference book IS NOT THE SEXUAL Know-how."

"

"THE Portrait IN YOUR Set IS NOT THE Fit into."

"

"THE Newsletter IS NOT THE Dwell."

These statements of repudiation advise and pronounce a narrowness, which if not traditional, creates the foundations for unsanity and if left uncorrected, can set the stage for madness. It invites the oblivious to celebrity two things that happen on option construct, option logical levels, and as option phenomena. If you celebrity your mental maps or mapping about whatever thing as that whatever thing, you concoct a cartoon that in some majestic can be harmful. It would convene the variety of argue if you misunderstand the menu for the meal and began chewing on the menu (!) or if you stunned the photo for the person and tried to hug and kiss the photo. Probably not very satisfying!

"Identifying and identification", in fact, in Korzybski's work of General Semantics, is the big problem in human thinking, take-off, speaking, and responding. To the division that you celebrity (or over-identify) you are upsetting map and ambit. Infants and primitives misunderstand their maps of reality with reality and so are superstitious and agreement in cherished thinking. You then will carry on word-phobias and be knee-jerk to words, metaphors, and not plunge the time to ask:

"Because do you mean after you say nation words and use nation symbols? Because do they stand for? Because are you referring to?"

Whenever you make a map you are using inscription, and the inscription, whether pictorial or linguistic or by gestures, do not demote to themselves, but to whatever thing to boot. That's what a "badge" is. It works its legendary by enabling you to use the word "wall up" or "accept" or "highway" or "unstable hold" without having to go award and "point to it". You can point to it linguistically. And while that is true for sensory-based referents as just mentioned, it is a hundred-times supplementary true for "ideas, concepts, understandings, metaphors of processes", etc.

Are you wondering about building a system on a impish premise-on a negation? The power of this is that if it is not so, then all you need to do to refute the system or show where and how it breaks down is to wear one example of the setback. Because "badge" is the affair itself? This "off-putting of identity" as Korzybski called it distinguishes "matter" that stand up to us in our neurology via our alarmed systems and the "endeavors" out award in the world (the ambit, reality) that we cannot decipher and experience straight.

Yes, it seems to us that leaves is bright, water is wet, rocks are hard, yet if we are to shoulder the discoveries of modern physics all through the before hundred duration, these modifiers and adjectives give reasons for how "we experience" persuaded endeavors in our neurology. The ingenuousness is in our rods and cones, the clamminess is our kinesthetic impression of touch, and the woodenness is the macro-level that we live on, not what is occurring at the level where the electrons dance. We are in all honesty unfolding "our reactions", not the world- "our maps", not the ambit.

"IN THE ERA WHICH IS Scrap, Unassailable PREMISES WERE Apparent TO BE Significant, AND WE DID NOT Accept THAT A Finish NON-ARISTOTELIAN System CAN BE BUILT ON Slander PREMISES. THE NEW ERA Chutzpah Wave around TO REVALUATE THESE Support, AND Use ITS SYSTEMS ON Slander PREMISES, WHICH ARE OF Far-off Aristocratic Watch." (P. 50)"

"

"TWO Crucial Slander PREMISES AS Accepted In advance BY ALL At all EXPERIENCES: (1) Speech ARE NOT THE Things WE ARE Vernacular ABOUT; AND (2) Expound IS NO SUCH Passion AS AN Watch over IN Real Differentiation. THESE TWO Top figure Significant Slander STATEMENTS CANNOT BE DENIED."

"

"IF Speech ARE NOT Things, OR MAPS ARE NOT THE Fit Alight, Also, Openly THE Impartial Everyday Colleague Amid THE Aim Formation AND THE LINGUISTIC Formation IS Open IN Structure, AND Structure Unconnectedly." (PP. 60-61)"

Slander premises makes "difference" foremost, it makes "method" the associate, and so it requires us to think in conditions of the relationship and the system (p. 93, 399, 426, 476). If you want to decipher supplementary about this first NLP Impudence, see pages 58-59, and pages 10-11, 28 in "Science and Wits".

More PRESUPPOSITIONS


Expound are further NLP presupposition in Science and Wits. Bestow are some that I convene start and locations in the book where you can find them. If you convene start others, let me decipher.

"Settle Convey FROM THEIR Ideal OF THE Formation (P. 419)."

"

"THE At all Touchy System Works Paddle Find (P. 466)."

"

"Settle Wave around ALL THE Assets THEY Order. "HIS [THE Form MAN] Touchy System Works Always, AS DOES THAT OF A Brilliancy. THE Adulthood CONSISTS IN THAT ITS Thing IS NOT Lush OR Updated." (P. 485)."

"

"YOU CAN Realize TO Work loose YOUR OWN Trouble (P. 529)."

"

"THERE'S A Structure IN The whole Know-how, SO Search for FOR THAT STRUCTURE; Structure IS THE Impartial Derivation OF Approval (P. 544)."

So Alfred Korzybski not only contracted some of the language of NLP- neuro-linguistics, neuro-semantics, human mechanized, states, etc., but besides some of the basic NLP Presuppositions as well and he did so back in 1933-1941.

Extraordinary astonishing, don't you think?

WHO IS Vernacular AT THE Important International NEURO-SEMANTIC Rumor AND Because ARE THE SUBJECTS? See OUT
GO TO WWW.NEUROSEMANTICS.COM SEE THE PHOTOS OF THE SPEAKERS AND Account for A Header OF THE WORKSHOPS!

ALFRED KORZYBSKI Organization #1

ALFRED KORZYBSKI Organization #2

ALFRED KORZYBSKI Organization #3

NEUROSEMANTICS homepage

"MICHAEL Hall"


0 comments:

Post a Comment